Abstract:
This paper discusses social discrimination from
the point of view of explaining what is meant
by discrimination, and puts forward some well-known
theories of social discrimination, discussing
their merits, demerits and applicability.
Determining and addressing the issue of social
discrimination is one of the prime concerns of
sociologists today. By studying this challenging
issue, one can craft policies and procedures to
mitigate social discrimination in the workplace
and in the community at large.
What Is Social Discrimination:
Discrimination may be defined
as positive or negative behavior based on stereotyped
beliefs about the occupants of a status. Discrimination
is positive from the point of view of whom it
favors, and negative for those who are discriminated
against.
What Is the Theory of Projection:
One of the founders of modern sociology, Durkheim
believed that humans bring order into the world
to suit their own needs. In a society based on
class system, the higher classes would serve to
impose their superiority on the lower classes.
This is the theory of projection, where the
higher or ruling class projects its superiority
over the lower class, and the lower or ruled class
get a feeling of subjection or suppression from
being under the higher classes of society.
The caste system in India is a case in point.
People of lower castes were subjected to doing
menial jobs and could not hope to match their
counterparts in the higher social strata. This
trend is undergoing a change now, as people of
lower strata have educated themselves and refuse
to submit to the dictates of the caste system-
they are carving our their own future
What Is the Frustration-Aggression Theory:
The frustration-aggression theory
1 argues that collective behavior is an aggressive
response to feelings of frustration. Thus many
of the collective movements in society especially
in the field of human rights have their genesis
in the practical aspect of this theory.
When the collective dissatisfaction of a mass
of people reaches a critical stage, they band
together to create a movement which will change
the status quo or result in the changes they desire.
This theory can be empirically proved if one studies
the reasons behind the French Revolution, for
example.
In modern times, where social and political parties
divide the populace into many groups having different
strains of thought, this theory may have lost
its appeal. But if different parties unite under
one banner to pursue the same interests, they
have a greater chance of success.
What Is Social Insecurity and Inferiority:
Social Insecurity and Inferiority refer
to vulnerabilities in individuals or communities
due to increases in population growth, changes
in economic structure or security reasons. Such
movements result in changing social structures.
The sad fact is that the Governments charged
with the responsibility of removing or marginalizing
such instances might themselves be unwittingly
contributing to the same. Affirmative action programs
are a way of reducing such insecurity, leading
to more stable social structures.
Anti-discriminatory laws and the upholding of
justice for complainants serve to reduce cases
of social insecurity and inferiority in society,
at least to some extent.
What Is An Authoritarian Personality:
The Authoritarian Personality
2 is believed to be the result of an upbringing
of rigid discipline and conditional affection.
While finding comfort in the identification of
submissive behavior towards authority, the authoritarian
person directs his/her aggression towards other
groups, often racial minorities, all in an attempt
to compensate for the feeling of personal weakness
with a search for absolute answers and strengths
in the outside world.
What Are Historical Precedents:
In sociology, historical precedents
are a set of theories or statements that seem
to explain problems, action or behavior. They
may be described as a well-formulated set of statements,
including ‘law-like’ generalizations
that are empirically testable.
The problem is that with the characteristics
of society constantly changing, and free movement
between different countries, we cannot always
cite historical precedents as infalliable measures
of social change.
What Are the Forces of Competition and
Exploitation:
Competition refers to a number
of individuals of groups vying for the same resource
or goal. The individual/ group that has the best
skills or uses the best tactics wins.
Competition can be a boon for an employer, as
he/she gets the best possible resource at a lower
cost. In modern times, competition and the desire
to succeed have edged businesses towards the exploitation
of their workers. Exploitation refers to the use
of people as a resource, with little or no consideration
of their well-being.
Thus exploitation involves
some persistent aspect of the socioeconomic system,
i.e an institution. Human beings are just treated
as a means to the end of making profits. Exploitation
may be organizational, relating to the power of
businesses to effect an individual’s worth
in the marketplace.
On a larger scale, we may talk of exploitation
at the structural level, where the entire business
class (capitalists) use the other parts of society
as pawns to do their bidding. This can happen
even in so-called ‘free-market’ economies.
What Is the Socialization Process:
The socialization process 3
may be described as the process of acquiring the
cultural characteristics of the community or society
one is born into. The process entails learning
the language of the community as well as the occupational
roles available to the different classes.
Through the socialization process, we learn and
adopt the cultural norms that constitute appropriate
behavior upheld by the leaders of a community.
The process of being socialized to a particular
culture has been termed ‘enculturation’
by anthropologists. We are encultured into our
specific cultures by our parents and others who
share in our upbringing.
What is the Marxist Model:
Karl Marx saw modern capitalism in terms of conflict
between two classes -the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.
The Marxist model argues that
the significant factor in racial discrimination
is not race or ethnicity, but rather the economic,
political and ideological organization of society
that allows or encourages certain dominant groups
to discriminate against other groups.
Thus racial discrimination is a product of class-based
systems of social stratification. The shortcoming
of the model is that, rather than attempt to focus
their analysis upon stereotypical, ideologically-produced
categories created by dominant social groups,
who seek to extend their social status by creating
an artificial grouping of lower social status,
Marxists tend to focus on the various ways social
/ biological differences (culture, sex, skin colour,
age and the like) are exploited by the relatively
powerful to oppress the relatively powerless.
Racial discrimination is degrading both for
the victimizers and the victims.
Bibliography
1. Frustration Aggression Theory. Referenced
on 15 Oct 2004.
2. The Authoritarian Personality. Referenced
on 15 Oct 2004.
3. Process of Socialization.
|